Thursday, December 30, 2004

Official First Poll

Today I bought a purple velvet blazer. Why did I do this? The answer is two-fold: I am Jewish, and it was on sale (70% off, oy!). So, with this extremely cheap vetement hanging in my closet now, I am wondering whether I should ever, EVER wear the damned thing.

And so I turn to you, dear reader. Please choose one or any combination of the following:

OPTION #A: Dude, a purple velvet blazer? That's gotta be the most homosexual garment ever created.
OPTION #B: Dude, a purple velvet blazer? That's fucking awesome! When can I borrow it?
OPTION #C: Scooter, only you could pull it off. That's why I love you and am giving you this large sack of money.
OPTION #D: Please, for the love of God, give it to a hobo.

Thus far, the response from the family has been:
Mom: Option #D
All three brothers: Option #A
Dad: Option #C, minus large sack of money

Vote!

Sunday, December 26, 2004

Post-Christmas notes from a Jewish boy

Hope everyone had/is having a Merry Christmas!

Personally, I spent the day at home with Noah while the family headed down to VA to meet up with longtime friends. Noah's been pretty sick for the past week so we figured it wouldn't be a great idea to pack him in a car with five other people.

Being at home (nearly) alone after time spent in college is a nice experience. At college, I've learned to be self-sufficient, structure my time, etc., but all within the confines of my apartment. Here, the dimensions of my living space have been dramatically expanded, and everything is nicer.

In case I'm not making sense, allow me to illustrate: At school, I read in my bed with my back against a bare wall. Here, I'm reading in front of a large fire, wearing a bathrobe, listening to Joao Gilberto, and sipping bourbon.

In short, life is good.

Wednesday, December 22, 2004

Fire

If anything brings out the neurosis of group behavior, it's fire alarms.

Last night, I went to see "Ocean's 12" (a somewhat-hard-to-follow heist film) with Ben, Andrew, Sarah, Ruchita, and Alix. About halfway through the movie, the projector suddenly cut off and a pre-recorded voice came over the PA: "A fire has been reported in the building. While we assess the situation, please walk calmly to the nearest exit." This message was accompanied by various whoops, bleeps, and bloops, all quite loud.

Most of the people in the theater stood up and began to move to the marked exits, but many people remained seated. Even those who were moving towards the exits were laughing and walking quite slowly. This particular theater, Regal Cinemas in Rockville, is entirely underground. A big fire on the ground level would render escape impossible. Mmm, crispy.

We emerged from the theater and massed with the rest of the crowd on other side of the street from the theater entrance. Already, a fire truck was outside. We all watched as two firemen calmly walked into the building, with only half their gear. Moments later, they ran back outside, threw on oxygen tanks/masks, and grabbed their fire axes.

Soon, a clump of theatergoers were crowding around the Regal manager, who was handing out refund stubs on the sidewalk. A middle-aged woman was complaining that there had been a fire at the last movie she'd been to. One young man in a t-shirt was angrily shouting at the manager, asking why he couldn't re-enter the building to get his jacket!

By this point, the theater was empty. However, many of the people who had just escaped the theater were entering the restaurant and ice cream shop on the street level of the same building.

That's not to say I didn't participate in the madness. After a few minutes, I was hungry, so I went with Alix into Tara Asia (the aforementioned restaurant...mind you, we got take-out and stood near the exit). While the klaxons continued to blare, people just sat at their dinner tables as though nothing were the matter. Conversation was nearly impossible, and if the insistent screams of the alarm were any indictation, death was imminient.

Admittedly, at Hopkins I don't always observe fire warnings...during a recent false alarm at Homewood, Shivank and I stayed in our rooms until the all-clear was announced. We decided to grab a sandwich at Eddie's and wound up walking downstairs while everyone else filed back to their rooms. I admit, the looks of disdain we got from people walking up the stairs made us feel somewhat badass walking down.

A 1997 survey by the National Fire Protection Association revealed that interviewees drastically overestimated the amount of time between when a smoke alarm goes off and when they can safely be out of the building (in the event of an actual emergency). The average estimate was seven and a half minutes; more than a third of respondants guessed ten minutes or more. In reality, the safety margin is two and a half minutes. And I'm a dork for looking that up.

So why do we ignore fire alarms, or treat them lightly? Well, for one thing, they're false 90% of the time. For another, as the NFPA survey shows, even when we think there's a fire we overestimate our safety margin. And of course, there's the badassity of non-chalance.

.....

But really, the most interesting moment of the Regal incident (which wound up being a small roof fire that was immediately extinguished) was seeing the Tara Asia diners calmly continuing their meals over the wail of the sirens. In that restaurant, people had clearly isolated and selectively ignored their sense of hearing. It reminded me of a restaurant in Paris that I read about, "Dans le Noir" ("In the Dark"):

"Diners sit in a room of inky blackness that the eyes never adjust to. And that's the idea. 'It awakens your other senses,' says the restaurant's owner Edouard de Broglie, who is not blind. 'It alters your perspective, your relations with others. It shows what happens when you can't see.'

"Fingertips seek out familiarity, patting the table for a fork, a plate, a hand to hold. The nose perks up to every passing plate. Under cover of darkness, texture and shape take on new importance. One realizes the role sight plays in the joy of eating."

Remarkable about both situations--Dans le Noir with its complete darkness and Tara Asia with its blaring fire alarm--is how easily we adapt when we've been deprived of one of our senses. In Tara Asia, I saw that diners had changed how they interacted with one another, moving to a gesture-based form of communication. Granted, it seemed crude: at most, pointing toward a particular dish or wine glass and giving a thumbs-up of approval, etc.

Similarly, accounts from the article about Dans le Noir revealed adapted behavior...in this case, the process of getting food from plate to mouth: "Eating is a challenge. A fork scooped across the plate often comes up empty. [They advise] fighting the temptation to eat with your hands -- something a blind person tries to avoid in public. But, lowering the head to the plate seems just fine. Nobody can see."

Undoubtedly, this adaptability is the reason our species has survived the ages. Good old evolution. But...as the highest form of life, you'd think we'd have the sense to avoid burning buildings.

Alas.

-Scoots

Tuesday, December 21, 2004

Yellow Fever

So, here I am again. After an inconspicuous two-year absence from blogging, the Scooter has returned.

Last weekend, the AllNighters took a trip up to Hahvahhd to sing with an all-female group, the Pitches. The logistics of moving 16 ADD-riddled college guys from Baltimore to Boston were daunting, but our highly capable treasurer (Joe Kim) worked everything out without a hitch. The actual concert was disappointingly intimate; only 25 people showed. The other guest group was a professional jazz ensemble from Australia; they blew us out of the water musically but we owned them on badassity.

One thing I noticed about Harvard that I've been missing at Hopkins: the brisk winter air of Harvard Square is infused with intellectual curiosity and engagement. Students, professors, and townspeople walk about in tweed and corduroy, and every snippet of conversation your ear picks up is freighted with insight. You just don’t get that feeling walking around Charles Village. We need a few good independent bookshops and more tweed.

Around four o’clock on the day of the concert, I noticed a flyer advertising a discussion on the “Asian Fetish.” Now, I admit that what caught my eye was a picture of a rather attractive and scantily-clad Asian model in a position of inviting repose. However, I’ve always been one to follow my instincts—and I had a couple hours to kill—so I made my way to the common room in the basement of Adams House. I also put in a call to Alistair (also notoriously appreciative of la femme asiatique), who met me at the forum.

About eight Harvard students (plus Alistair and I) gathered in the dark-paneled room. Although I didn’t know quite what to expect, the discussion soon proved engaging. Essentially, our aim was to determine:
-What is the “Asian fetish?”
-Why does it exist?
-What distinguishes a fetish from mere preference?
-Is the Asian fetish inherently racist?
The Asian fetish, we decided, is the tendency of some white males to be attracted almost entirely to Asian females. With a fetish, as opposed to a preference, this attraction is rooted in the pre-conceived power relationship between the dominant white male and the subservient Asian female. I don’t mean to imply that men with Asian fetishes are racist or sexist; rather, that on some subconscious level, dominance is a factor.

We also tried to figure out why white men in particular are often so attracted to Asian women. I put forth a theory of the “second best,” based on familial and societal expectations. Suppose that a white male is attracted by the exotic, by what is different from his own. Suppose also that he is influenced by preconceived notions (positive and negative) about females from a variety of races. It seems that the stereotypes associated with Asian females (quiet, intellectual, subservient) are also those that are most acceptable to white society. Thus, the white male finds himself tracking toward Asians as the second-most familial and socially acceptable group of romantic partners. In other words, the “Asian fetish” may not be a reflection of the racism or sexism of the male, but rather an outgrowth of societal expectations.

Walking back toward the center of campus from Adams House, Alistair and I remarked how rare such discussions are at Hopkins. Here was a topic—the Asian fetish—that would surely spark the interest of scores of students at our school. But how many would tear themselves away from studying Orgo to show up at such a roundtable?

Later, I shared this thought with a handful AllNighters while we waited for the show to start. Their reaction: “But we’re at a research institution, not a liberal arts school.” But really, does being at a research-oriented school preclude intellectualism? I would imagine that students at a research school would be just as inclined to intellectualism as liberal arts students.

The only example of real intellectual engagement at Hopkins that I can remember has been the Thursday night Writing Seminars readings in dark-paneled (important!) Gilman 323. Outside of these readings of student poetry and fiction, I’ve been hard-pressed to find anything intellectually stimulating on campus. Writing opinions for the News-Letter has been somewhat engaging, but not in an interactive way.

I think this lack of intellectualism has influenced me in a bad way over the last semester. I’ve found myself backsliding into procrastination and Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Work seems less and less interesting when it isn’t being supplemented by intellectual interaction outside the classroom. Personally, I’d like to get rid of the television in our Homewood common room altogether, but I don’t think Jaan/Dave/Shivank could see it go so I don’t think that’s a possibility. Certainly, for next year I don’t want a TV or Playstation. More books, more guitar.

Maybe next semester I’ll start a discussion circle. Each week, we could have a new topic. The first one, perhaps: “The Asian Fetish: Fact or Fiction?” Who knows, maybe we could actually fill Gilman 323.

Anyway, I’m off to read by the fire…. “Reefer Madness,” a book about the American black market. I’ll tell you about it later.

As for comments: Please, do comment actively! I presume it'll take a while before many people are reading this page, as I haven't told anyone that it exists. But eventually I'd like to get a nice back-and-forth going.

-Scoots